{"id":15348,"date":"2020-10-04T22:10:28","date_gmt":"2020-10-04T20:10:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/paricenter.com\/?post_type=tribe_events&p=15348"},"modified":"2024-04-24T11:27:20","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T09:27:20","slug":"david-bohm-dialogue-is-there-a-different-way-to-talk-together","status":"publish","type":"tribe_events","link":"https:\/\/paricenter.com\/event\/david-bohm-dialogue-is-there-a-different-way-to-talk-together\/","title":{"rendered":"David Bohm Dialogue: Is There a Different Way to Talk Together"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n\t

\n\t\t\n\t\t\tOctober 31, 2020\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t @ \t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t6:00 pm\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t – \t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\tDecember 5, 2020\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t @ \t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t6:00 pm\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCET<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\t\n\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Online<\/a><\/h3>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

David Bohm Dialogue: Is There a Different Way to Talk Together<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Saturday, October 31 \u2013 December 5, 2020<\/strong>
Six Saturday Sessions of 2 hours and 30 mins
<\/em>18:00 CEST \u00a0\/ \u00a013:00 EST on October 31, \u00a0thereafter 12:00 EST<\/p>\n\n\n\n

with\u00a0Sally Jeffery, Manfred Kritzler, Beth Macy,\u00a0Caroline Pawluk and David Schrum<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Register early as this program has a limit of 16 participants. <\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n

Dialogue works at several levels. At the deepest level it is about the development and transformative power of the collective mind. At another it provides a \u2018display\u2019 of thought, slowing down its movement and allowing its observation. It allows the expression of many alternative views on a particular topic, some of which are presented in non-negotiable ways. Thanks to the group process these differences do not lead to confrontation but are held together in a creative tension. Rather than trying to resolve opposing positions through compromise, it is possible to move to an \u2018order between and beyond.<\/p>\nDavid Bohm<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The Dialogue Program<\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

This dialogue program is an invitation both to those new to dialogue and those who have participated previously. It is a journey together, without leaders or followers. Registrants and convenors enquire as co-participants, as we explore the movement of conscious mind and touch into what may lie beyond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Each week a presenter will offer a brief introduction to a dialogue theme. Group dialogues of about two hours will follow. All convenors will participate in each session. Through this series, our weekly introductory focus will progress\u2014beginning from (1) a general overview, then moving to (2) self, (3) the other, (4) the group as a whole, (5) silence and (6) the dialogic field. In practice, however, our intention is that every session may bring in all these aspects and that we explore without boundaries, in freedom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Topics and presenters are listed below, each followed by a<\/em> quotation\/quotations<\/em> by David Bohm that touch on the week\u2019s focus: <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Week 1<\/u> \u2013 Dialogue – A Journey Together<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 with David Schrum<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

What is it to discover the roots of our common human consciousness? Through David Bohm\u2019s approach to dialogue, we will open an enquiry into this question as we begin our journey together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The object of dialogue is not to analyze things, or to win an argument, or to exchange opinions. Rather, it is to suspend your opinions and to look at the opinions\u2014to listen to everyone\u2019s opinions, to suspend them, and to see what all that means<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I suggest that there is a potential for self-awareness of thought\u2014that the concrete, real process of the movement of thought could be self-aware, without bringing in a \u201cself\u201d who is aware of it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Week 2<\/u> \u2013 The Art of Listening<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 with David Schrum<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Deep listening is a transformative process for the listener. As we listen to both the voices of others and the voice within, we enter into an exploration together. Through intimate listening consciousness flowers, to reveal its inner structure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

If you see other people\u2019s thought, it becomes your own thought, and you treat it as your own thought. And when an emotional charge comes up, you share all the emotional charges, too, if they affect you; you hold them together with all the thoughts<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Week 3<\/u> \u2013 Suspension and Moving Together<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 with Manfred Kritzler<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Through suspension of assessment and judgement, whatever thoughts are arising in me have the same value as the thoughts of others.  This gives us the opportunity to move together beyond the limitation of thought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

If each of us in the room is suspending, then we are all doing the same thing. We are looking at everything together.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Accordingly, a different kind of consciousness is possible among us, a participatory consciousness\u2026.Everything can move between us. Each person is participating, is partaking of the whole meaning of the group and also taking part in it. We can call that true dialogue.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The point of suspension is to help make proprioception possible, to create a mirror so that you can see the results of your thought. You have it inside yourself because your body acts as a mirror and you can see tensions arising in the body. Also, other people are a mirror, the group is a mirror.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Week 4<\/u> \u2013 Facilitation<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 with Sally Jeffery<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

This process of dialogue, as David Bohm proposes it, is not easy. Perhaps there are ways to support its emergence. It begins with seeing the need for this kind of dialogue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

On the whole you could say that if you are defending your opinions, you are not serious. Likewise, if you are trying to avoid something unpleasant inside of yourself, that is also not being serious. But in dialogue you have to be serious. It is not dialogue if you are not\u2014not in the way I\u2019m using the word.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Week 5<\/u> \u2013 Silence and Listening<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 with Caroline Pawluk<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The beauty of silent listening is that we just watch and listen, doing nothing about what we observe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

But in a participatory view, the suggestion is that we have the unlimited as the ground of everything\u2014that our true being is unlimited.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

So we can see there is no \u201croad\u201d to truth. What we are trying to say is that in dialogue we share all the roads and we finally see that none of them matters. We see the meaning of all the roads, and therefore we come to the \u201cno road.”<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Week 6<\/u> \u2013 Sensing the Field<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 with Beth Macy<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Listening intently to the silence that is beyond our personal thought, what seeks to emerge from that field of common consciousness?  What inklings of new meaning are arising?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

I am proposing, however, that the field of thought is limited. I am also suggesting that there is the \u201cunlimited,\u201d which contains the limited. This \u201cunlimited\u201d is not just in the direction of going to greater and greater distances out to the end of the universe; but much more importantly, it is also going into more and more subtlety.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

SALLY JEFFERY<\/strong> was introduced to the teachings of J. Krishnamurti while an undergraduate in Sociology. Through involvement with his school in England, she met and was impressed by David Bohm (a founding trustee of the school) and became committed to his work with dialogue. Over more than three decades, she has participated in dialogue in many settings including prisons and her local (Lancaster) dialogue group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

MANFRED KRITZLER<\/strong> was born in N\u00fcrnberg, Germany. He was a partner in a German tax consultant firm in Stuttgart and a member of an international group of chartered accountants. He specialized in international taxes and transferring firms to the next generation. Having left the partnership some years ago, he is now a self-employed coach based mainly on David Bohm\u2018s holographic worldview. Manfred is presently in the process of creating a workshop with the title, \u2018Trust in the Unknown.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

BETH MACY<\/strong> has followed a career interwoven with a common thread\u2014change. She has been a manager, leader, consultant or participant in organizations experiencing difficult issues: organizations from small to large, private to public, non-profit to profit, health care to oil and gas, local to global. David Bohm’s dialogue has been core to her research, writing, consulting and teaching for nearly three decades. Living in the USA (Texas) she is completing a book on the ideas and individuals who influenced Bohm\u2019s methodology of dialogue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CAROLINE PAWLUK<\/strong> has been involved in a local dialogue group in Sudbury, Canada over the past twenty years and in various international forums in the United States and Europe during the past eight years. She is presently engaged with four online dialogue groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DAVID SCHRUM<\/strong> has been involved in dialogue for over thirty years. His experience includes dialogues extending across approaches that arise from David Bohm\u2019s work, Krishnamurti\u2019s teachings, Ojibway spiritual traditions, and other forms.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t